WE ARE ON SUBSTACK - our opinions, episodes and what I can't say on a podcast
Specifically for SeniorsSpecifically for Seniors
  • Home
  • Episodes
  • About
  • Blog
  • Your Story
  • FUQ
  • Newsletter
  • Contact
  • Larry Barsh, DMD Substack
  • Search
Larry Barsh, DMD Substack
Search
March 31, 2026

The Trump Administration Has a Race Problem.

Thanks for reading! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

Trump Administration Begins Inquiries Into 3 Medical Schools in Show of Power

The government is seeking information about medical school applicants from each of the past seven years, including test scores, home ZIP codes and the disclosure of any familial relationships to alumni or ties to university donors. The administration also demanded copies of any internal messages at the universities about diversity, equity and inclusion and any correspondence between school officials and pharmaceutical companies about admissions policies.

“At this time, our investigation will focus on possible race discrimination in medical school admissions,” Harmeet K. Dhillon, the Justice Department’s assistant attorney general for civil rights, wrote in each of the letters.

New York Times March 26, 2026

and

Hegseth Strikes Two Black and Two Female Officers From Promotion List

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is blocking the promotion of four Army officers to be one-star generals, a highly unusual move that has prompted some senior military officials to question whether the officers are being singled out because of their race or gender.

Two of the officers targeted by Mr. Hegseth are Black and two are women on a promotion list that consists of about three dozen officers, most of whom are white men, senior military officials said.

New York Times March 27, 2026

March 2026 Word count: 620 | Reading time: ~3 minutes


Let’s begin with a simple question: does anyone in this administration talk to anyone else in this administration?

Because in the span of forty-eight hours this week, the United States government managed to declare — with a straight face and apparently no internal memo system — that race-conscious decision-making is both a federal crime AND official Pentagon policy. Simultaneously. In the same news cycle. On the same planet.

Try to keep up.

Act One: The DOJ Rides In To Save Meritocracy

Harmeet Dhillon, the Justice Department’s Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights — pause on that title for just a moment — fired off letters to three American medical schools demanding seven years of admissions data. Test scores. ZIP codes. Legacy connections. Internal DEI communications. Basically everything short of the applicants’ astrological signs and childhood traumas.

The stated reason, in Dhillon’s own words: “possible race discrimination in medical school admissions.”

The horror. The absolute constitutional horror of a medical school possibly — possibly — factoring in the lived experience of the human beings it is training to treat other human beings. The DOJ will not stand for it. America will not stand for it. The ghost of colorblindness demands satisfaction.

Race, the administration would like you to know, has absolutely no place in institutional decision-making.

Are we clear? Good.

Act Two: Pete Hegseth Reads the Same Memo and Does the Opposite

Twenty-four hours later, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth — a man whose primary qualification for running the United States military appears to be a willingness to say the quiet parts at full volume on Fox News — quietly blocked four Army officers from promotion to Brigadier General.

Four officers. Out of roughly three dozen on the list.

Two are Black. Two are women. The other thirty-odd? Mostly white men. Promoted without incident. Sailing serenely toward their stars while the administration that just declared race irrelevant made a very race-relevant decision without apparently noticing the irony, or more likely, not giving a damn.

Now, to be scrupulously fair: maybe this is pure coincidence. Maybe these four officers were blocked on pure merit. Maybe Pete Hegseth reviewed their files with the same rigorous objectivity that Harmeet Dhillon is demanding from Harvard Medical School.

And maybe I have a bridge to sell you.

The Actual Diagnosis

Here is what is actually happening, for anyone who prefers their reality unvarnished:

The administration does not oppose race-conscious decision-making. It has never opposed race-conscious decision-making. What it opposes, with the full prosecutorial weight of the United States Justice Department, is race-conscious decision-making that benefits the wrong people.

That’s it. That’s the whole ideology. It fits on a bumper sticker if you use a small enough font.

The medical school investigation is loud — press releases, formal letters, the full pageant of principled outrage. The Hegseth promotion block was quiet. You almost have to admire the discipline it takes to do both things in the same week and hope nobody puts them in the same article.

Somebody did. You’re reading it.

The Prognosis

What I’m watching this week isn’t incompetence. Incompetence would almost be comforting — incompetence you can fix with a better org chart and a strongly worded memo. This is something colder and more deliberate.

This is the system working exactly as designed — using the language of fairness to concentrate power, using the machinery of civil rights law to dismantle civil rights, and counting on the news cycle to move fast enough that nobody connects Tuesday’s story to Wednesday’s.

The right hand knows exactly what the left hand is doing.

That’s the part that should keep you up at night.

For the Discerningly Disillusioned Subscribe. Share. Rage responsibly.

FTS

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Join us on our podcast Specifically for Seniors, where satire meets substance and storytelling sparks civic engagement. Each episode dives into topics like authoritarianism, political spectacle, environmental justice, humor, history and even fly fishing and more—layered with metaphor, wit, and historical insight. We feature compelling guest interviews that challenge, inspire, and empower, especially for senior audiences and civic storytellers. Listen to the audio on all major podcast platforms, watch full video episodes on YouTube, or explore more at our website.

Let’s keep the conversation sharp, smart, and unapologetically bold

Specifically for Seniors Logo

Specifically for Seniors is a podcast designed as an online resource for a vibrant and diverse senior community.

Visit our Substack page for commentary. (Adult language)

  • Episodes
  • About
  • Blog
  • Reviews
  • Subscribe
  • Your Story
  • Privacy
  • FUQ
  • Contact
  • Webinars
  • MemoryLane
  • Specifically for Seniors Substack
  • Larry Barsh, DMD
  • Larry Barsh, DMD Substack
  • © Specifically for Seniors 2025